{"id":2603,"date":"2011-05-01T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-05-01T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/news.christianacare.org\/2011\/05\/improved-survival-after-pulmonary-metastasectomy-for-soft-tissue-sarcoma\/"},"modified":"2021-12-13T21:20:11","modified_gmt":"2021-12-13T21:20:11","slug":"improved-survival-after-pulmonary-metastasectomy-for-soft-tissue-sarcoma","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/research.christianacare.org\/publications\/2011\/05\/01\/improved-survival-after-pulmonary-metastasectomy-for-soft-tissue-sarcoma\/","title":{"rendered":"Improved survival after pulmonary metastasectomy for soft tissue sarcoma"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Predina JD, Puc MM, Bergey MR, Sonnad SS, Kucharczuk JC, Staddon A, Kaiser LR, Shrager JB<\/p>\n<p>J Thorac Oncol 2011 May;6(5):913-9<\/p>\n<p>PMID: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pubmed\/21750417\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">21750417<\/a><\/p>\n<h2>Abstract<\/h2>\n<p><p><strong>INTRODUCTION: <\/strong>Survival after pulmonary metastasectomy for soft tissue sarcoma (STS) has been lower than in osteosarcoma (14-40% versus 40-50%). With improved patient selection criteria and advanced chemotherapy agents, we hypothesized that survival after metastasectomy for STS has improved in recent years.<\/p>\n<p><strong>METHODS: <\/strong>Retrospective study of 48 patients undergoing pulmonary metastasectomy for STS between 1995 and 2007. Potential predictors of overall survival and disease-free survival (DFS) were examined using the log-rank test or Cox regression. Multivariate analysis was conducted using Cox regression.<\/p>\n<p><strong>RESULTS: <\/strong>Overall survival after initial metastasectomy was 67% and 52% at 3 and 5 years, respectively; DFS was 17% and 10% at 3 and 5 years. Univariate analysis indicated that \u22642 pulmonary metastases (p = 0.03), diameter of largest metastasis \u22642 cm (p = 0.09), and the absence of extrapulmonary metastases (p = 0.10) were associated with longer overall survival. Absence of extrapulmonary metastases (p = 0.07) and smaller size of the largest pulmonary metastasis (p = 0.06) were associated with longer DFS. Before 2001, 46.7% of patients received adjuvant chemotherapy versus 72.7% after (p = 0.10). Neither use of chemotherapy nor chemotherapy type was related to overall survival or DFS.<\/p>\n<p><strong>CONCLUSION: <\/strong>Five-year overall survival is substantially higher after pulmonary metastasectomy for STS in our study relative to previously published results (52% versus 14-40%). This improvement does not seem to be the result of greater use of, or newer, chemotherapeutic regimens. Among potential explanations, improved patient selection is the most likely factor.<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Predina JD, Puc MM, Bergey MR, Sonnad SS, Kucharczuk JC, Staddon A, Kaiser LR, Shrager JB J Thorac Oncol 2011 May;6(5):913-9 PMID: 21750417 Abstract INTRODUCTION: Survival after pulmonary metastasectomy for soft tissue sarcoma (STS) has been lower than in osteosarcoma (14-40% versus 40-50%). With improved patient selection criteria and advanced chemotherapy agents, we hypothesized that<\/p>\n<p><a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/research.christianacare.org\/publications\/2011\/05\/01\/improved-survival-after-pulmonary-metastasectomy-for-soft-tissue-sarcoma\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Improved survival after pulmonary metastasectomy for soft tissue sarcoma<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[41,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2603","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ireach","category-pubs-pres"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/research.christianacare.org\/publications\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2603","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/research.christianacare.org\/publications\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/research.christianacare.org\/publications\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/research.christianacare.org\/publications\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/research.christianacare.org\/publications\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2603"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/research.christianacare.org\/publications\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2603\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/research.christianacare.org\/publications\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2603"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/research.christianacare.org\/publications\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2603"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/research.christianacare.org\/publications\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2603"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}