The Unmet Need for Postacute Rehabilitation Among Medicare Observation Patients: A Single-Center Study

Goldstein JN, Schwartz JS, McGraw P, Banks TL, Hicks LS

J Hosp Med 2017 03;12(3):168-172

PMID: 28272593

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Medicare beneficiaries admitted under observation status must pay for postacute inpatient rehabilitation (PAIR) services, out of pocket, at potentially prohibitive costs.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if there is an unmet need for PAIR among Medicare observation patients and if this care is associated with longer hospital stay and increased rehospitalization.

DESIGN/SETTING: Observational study using electronic medical record and administrative data from a regional health system.

PATIENTS: 1323 community-dwelling Medicare patients admitted under observation status.

MEASUREMENTS: Summary statistics were calculated for demographic and administrative variables. Physical therapy (PT) and case management recommendations for a representative sample of 386 medical records were reviewed regarding need for PAIR services. Linear regression was used to measure the association between PT recommendation and hospital length of stay, adjusting for ICD-9 (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision) diagnosis, age, sex, and provider. Chi-square test was used to determine the association between PT recommendation and 30-day hospital revisit.

RESULTS: Of the 1323 study patients, 11 (0.83%) were discharged to PAIR facilities. However, 17 (4.4%) of the 386 patients whose charts were reviewed received a recommendation for this care. Adjusted mean hospital stay was longer (P ⟨ 0.001) for patients recommended for rehabilitation (75.9 h) than for patients with no PT needs (46.8 h). In addition, the 30-day hospital revisit rate was higher (P = 0.037) for the patients who had been recommended for rehabilitation (52.9%, 9/17) than for those who had not (25.4%, 30/118).

CONCLUSIONS: Medicare observation patients’ potential need for PAIR services is 5- to 6-fold higher than their use of these services. Observation patients recommended for this care may have worse outcomes. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2017;12:168-172.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *